List styles don't have any indicator. Suggestion: draw a block that looks similar to a bigger pixel. about bootstra.386

[kristopolous]

I believe this is already being done. See here: https://www.diigo.com/item/image/5enzo/c7r4 ... if you would like to contend this isn't what you are talking about then please re-open this bug.

[EvanCarroll]

@kristopolous see linked issue, I don't think that's what he's talking about.

You can also this on this page, https://kristopolous.github.io/BOOTSTRA.386/base-css.html#lists

For me the ordered, unordered, and unstyled render the same. This seems problematic because without a visual indicator to at least differentiate an ordered list what's the purpose of giving them a semantic markup to begin with? You're losing information that users will expect without styling by styling it away.

I would expect the Ordered and Unordered lists to have some form of bulleted list, and some form of numbered list.

[kristopolous]

For 2.0? alright. sure I'll look into it

[kristopolous]

Also this emphasizes that I'll need to update the demo space and put the different versions there somewhere

[EvanCarroll]

@kristopolous I'm not exactly sure what version. I'm using zula.386 zola.386 which I believe is sourcing the real work from this project I would have to look into that. I just saw the issue already on the board, and see the issue is present in the demo.

[kristopolous]

zula.386? Did you spell that right? Can you link me to it?

[EvanCarroll]

No, I didn't spell it right. =(

• https://www.getzola.org/themes/zola-386/
• https://github.com/lopes/zola.386 (repo)

Zola. The Rust static-content generator that competes with Hugo. I already linked the issue on their board to this one above. I filed it there before working my way here, lopes/zola.386#16

[kristopolous]

that is indeed v2. I just fixed it.

[kristopolous]

the disc list-style-type doesn't have an equivalent character in MS-ASCII but the square is basically character 254 so we'll just default to that.

[kristopolous]

oh hey that alignment is wrong

[EvanCarroll]

This is a huge improvement, but why aren't ordered lists, numbered? I would expect that.

This code,

1. foo foo foo
2. bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar
3. this is the third element

For me renders like this in GitHub,

1. foo foo foo
2. bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar
3. this is the third element

Picture:

If you remove the numbers, how will you know where 2 stops and 3 starts? And what step of an ordered process you're reading?

[kristopolous]

Why? Honestly because this is something I did for my own amusement 11 years ago. But let's set that aside. Here you go.
Should be working.

[EvanCarroll]

That looks beautiful. As to why? Because this is Enterprise ready theming here. This shit is gold. Hell yes I'm going to use this. #BorlandIsBeautiful

[kristopolous]

cool, I hope you enjoyed my new japanese promo video on the project's main readme page over here: https://github.com/kristopolous/BOOTSTRA.386

[EvanCarroll]

Hahha that's glorious. Well done @kristopolous! Btw, if you like this Kitty has a Borland theme which compliments it well.