Can this still compile ? about podofobrowser

[drizt]

Actually CMakeLists.txt is not ported to Qt5. This is the problem. qmake building also not works on Linux but by another reasons.

[KubaO]

“Linux” is way too general to know. What’s your source of libpodofo? I.e. where does it come from? If it’s installed by your distribution’s package manager, then use that to investigate where it got installed (e.g. rpm -ql libpodofo) and what’s there. If you have built it yourself, then the arguments passed to the configure command will determine where it got installed (if you installed it, that is if you had done `make install`). Cheers, Kuba

…

On Jun 16, 2019, at 9:47 AM, Eliran Gonen ***@***.***> wrote: What would be the values for the linux CMake command, i.e. cmake -G "Unix Makefiles" \ -DLIBPODOFO_DIR=/path/to/podofo_install_dir \ -DCMAKE_INCLUDE_PATH=/path/to/extra/includes \ -DCMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/extra/libraries I would figure that LIBPODOFO would be /usr/include/podofo/ — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[KubaO]

Sorry, I haven’t looked into this in ages. I’ll check into it this week. A Qt source build should be simple, or just use your distributors package. Or macports on Mac.

…

9 sep. 2019 kl. 12:15 fm skrev ringo458 ***@***.***>:  Hi, I built the current version of podofo on centos 7 with qt4 but the 0.5 version of podofobrowser would not make. So I got yours and used the same cmake formula I had pieced together for podofo: cmake -G "Unix Makefiles" -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX="$HOME/podofo" -DWANT_LIB64:BOOL=TRUE -DLIBFREETYPE_FT2BUILD_H=/usr/include/freetype2 -DLIBFREETYPE_FTHEADER_H=/usr/include/freetype2/freetype/config that seemed to go OK but make died: ***@***.*** podofobrowser-trunk]$ make [ 4%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/podofobrowser.dir/podofoutil.o /home/steve/podofo/podofobrowser-trunk/src/podofoutil.cpp:5:21: fatal error: QtWidgets: No such file or directory #include I set the QTDIR to qt5 and that didn't fix anything. I've already noticed problems with a few of the binaries that I built under qt4 so I feel that it;s a good idea to track down something more modern and maybe build from what you are working with, but that seems to require SVN and I am an SVN virgin. Given that I am kinda stuck building things my way do you know where I can find a version that will work well with your version of the browser. And do you thing that version is less buggy than the code I found on sourceforge and would therefore justify building qt5? Thanks :) — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[MarjaE2]

It doesn't currently show up in ports search podofo

[KubaO]

Consider it true abandonware at this point. I won’t be touching this in any near future. Sorry

…

19 juni 2020 kl. 7:36 em skrev MarjaE2 ***@***.***>:  It doesn't currently show up in ports search podofo — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.