Problem in footnote about bidi

[kvafa]

You are right. Is it possible the bidi package to use some codes like perpage package for solving this issue?

I have not investigated the issue thoroughly; I just made some observation without actually looking at what is going on exactly.

One way to go forward is to see what perpage does that 'bidi-perpagedoes not and extendbidi-perpage' to get the correct behavior.

Another possible solution is to avoid resetting footnotes by using a different algorithm.

I just need to find some free time to investigate this and fix it.

[kvafa]

My investigation so far shows that the issue also happens without using xepersian/bidi packages. Look particularly at pages 4, 6, 8, and 10.

\documentclass[12pt]{article}            % or some other class
\usepackage{zref-perpage} 
\zmakeperpage{footnote}
\newcount\footCounter
\newcommand{\mfootnote}[1]{%
	\loop
	\ifnum\footCounter<#1
		\footnote{Test}%
		\advance\footCounter by 1
	\repeat\footCounter0%
}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont{IRXLotus}
\usepackage{ptext}
\begin{document}

	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]\mfootnote{5}
	\ptext[1-2]

\end{document}

[kvafa]

I asked this question about different methods of resetting footnote numbers for more details. Only one of the methods worked correctly (with footmisc package). Comment: The ones I mark not ok can not work as the footnotes have been allocated numbers before page breaking. That is why footmisc offers code to implement this.

I do not think that it is footmisc that implements it as it loads perpage package. That is, if you load perpage directly instead footmisc, you should also get the correct output.

[kvafa]

Could you please also post Vahid Damanafshan's example from Telegram? I do not have access to Telegram as I left my phone in home back in Australia.

[bahman-mirzakhani]

When I asked Mr. DamanAfshan, he said that I had the same problem.

[kvafa]

I think the two issues are slightly different although somehow related; from memory, I think his example had the old footnote cs \paragraphfootnotes or something similar while your example uses the new footnote cs \ParagraphFootnotes.

Anyway, it helps me a lot if I also can have access to Vahid's specific example.

[bahman-mirzakhani]

I asked this question about different methods of resetting footnote numbers for more details. Only one of the methods worked correctly (with footmisc package). Comment: The ones I mark not ok can not work as the footnotes have been allocated numbers before page breaking. That is why footmisc offers code to implement this.

[bahman-mirzakhani]

You are right. Is it possible the bidi package to use some codes like perpage package for solving this issue?

[bahman-mirzakhani]

You are right. Is it possible the bidi package to use some codes like perpage package for solving this issue?

Note: unfortunately the perpage package also transfers the last line of the previous page to the next page and its place remains empty. Even the \flushbottom command doesn't fill it.

[saeidm23]

Is there any solution for the bug?

[bahman-mirzakhani]

Is there any solution for the bug?

According to comments, you can use perpage package as follows:

\usepackage{perpage} 
\MakePerPage{footnote}

[saeidm23]

Many thanks. But that does not resolve the issue.