Consider providing ES6 builds about js-client-sdk

[kinyoklion]

Hello @wojtekmaj,

Thank you for the request.

The main interest here is the packaged size of the SDK, correct?

Filed internally as 162092

Thank you,
Ryan

[wojtekmaj]

Yep! You technically can use e.g. Webpack alias to rewrite imports to use src folder & build the library yourself, but I think it's too much of a hassle for most developers. Even having two builds alongside, if you don't want any breaking changes for the time being, would be a big quality of life improvement.

[vitalikda]

@kinyoklion any updates here? Looks like react sdk was already converted to ES6

[adrigardi90]

Same, it would be helpful to get it compiled to ES6 so the bundle size improves. I would have expected it to be smaller in the first place

[tniezurawski]

Looks like the size of the lib is growing:

As mentioned above, react SDK benefited from the switch:

although the numbers are not as impressive as @wojtekmaj's predictions maybe the result would be better for this project 🤷‍♂️ . Anyway, maybe compiling to ES6 is not a bad idea?