Need Help for testing about bliss

[LeaVerou]

Hey there, thanks for contributing!
There is no click method on li elements. Only some types of elements have this natively (e.g. a elements).
If you were trying to fire a click event on the element, change it to:

$('#tete li')._.fire("click");

(in a rush so haven’t checked the rest of the code)

[wcastand]

Thank for the answer.
I guess chrome add itself the click function on all the elements because it worked on my test to understand delegate in chrome :)

When i use the fire function, i have no error but it didn't fire the click function from the $.delegate
I used the same code as my first post, except the line :

$('#tete li').click();
//replace by
$('#tete li')._.fire("click");

---

I don't know if i have to open an other issue. But when i try to create an element with the property 'events', i get an error:

$.create("a", {
    href: "#here",
    title: "Permalink",
    className: "permalink",
    events: {
        click: function(evt) {
            console.log("test")
        }
    }
});

ReferenceError: Can't find variable: EventTarget
            at F:/Web/bliss/bliss.js:408
            at F:/Web/bliss/bliss.js:328
            at F:/Web/bliss/bliss.js:566
            at F:/Web/bliss/bliss.js:588
            at F:/Web/bliss/bliss.js:88
            at F:/Web/bliss/tests/Events/DelegateSpec.js:15

[LeaVerou]

I think you're using an older version. Please pull?

[wcastand]

Ok, i update my fork and it works. My bad here

Anyway for the test of delegate, it still doesn't work.

it("add event on children of subject", function() {
        var test = false;
        var subject = document.createElement("div");
        subject.id = "tete";
        var aa = $.create("a", {
            href: "#here",
            title: "Permalink",
            className: "permalink",
            events: {
                click: function(evt) {
                    console.log("testa")
                }
            }
        });
        subject.appendChild(aa)
        document.body.appendChild(subject);
        var tt = subject._.delegate("click",
        {
            a: function(){
                console.log("tea");
                test = true;
            }
        });
        $('#tete a')._.fire('click');
        expect(test).to.be.equal(true);
    });

LOG: 'testa'
PhantomJS 1.9.8 (Windows 8 0.0.0) $.delegate add event on children of subject FAILED

So when i fire 'click', the callback from the $.create works but the one from delegate doesn't.
I try to remove the event from the $.create and the result is the same.
Maybe i didn't understand how to delegate function work :/

[guoguo12]

So I rewrote the test to work independently of other Bliss methods. (I hope you don't mind, @wcastand.)

I think the issue here is that $.delegate legitimately doesn't work on PhantomJS. When I run my test, I'll get an error like

PhantomJS 1.9.8 (Windows 8 0.0.0) $.delegate adds event to children of the subject FAILED
        TypeError: 'undefined' is not a function (evaluating 'evt.target.matches(selector)') (C:/Users/guogu_000/Git/bliss/bliss.js:480)

indicating that Element.matches isn't valid in PhantomJS. Replacing Element.matches with Element.webkitMatchesSelector makes the test pass on PhantomJS.

[Note: I force-pushed over commit 39c214e, so that's why it shows up twice. Didn't know the mention wouldn't go away. Sorry!]

[wcastand]

Hi,
I don't mind at all. Thanks for the help !
I will continue to test the others methods of Events.

[zdfs]

This begs the question, should we have tests that only execute in a real browser and tests that execute in a headless env? The strategy being that we try to make something work in Phantom, and if we can't, save it for when the developer is using a real browser.

Just throwing out ideas.

[guoguo12]

Honestly, I wouldn't mind. PhantomJS is being really buggy for me on watch mode. I'll karma start and everything will pass, and then I'll save one of the test files without changing anything and PhantomJS will fail. Am I missing something about how PhantomJS operates during watch mode?

[wcastand]

I actually had the same issue when i was trying to figure it out delegate. Sometime my test just didn't pass on my DelegateSpec.js and at one point i get an error on a bliss file. i just save the file again and the error disappear.
I didn't understand why.

[zdfs]

Actually, maybe we can use Firefox. Travis-ci seems to have support for that.

[zdfs]

I'm going to change our config to Firefox, and see if Travis builds. Probably better if we use a real browser if Travis supports one.

[zdfs]

Ok. I think I'm almost there.

[zdfs]

Ok. It seems to be running the tests with Firefox now, but can anyone tell me if it's really running the tests or not. It seems like it is, but the counts are off: https://travis-ci.org/LeaVerou/bliss/jobs/95623030

[zdfs]

According to the screenshot here (http://www.sitepoint.com/testing-javascript-jasmine-travis-karma/), it seems like that's the normal behavior.

[zdfs]

And I see 27 SUCCESS lines. So I think we can have a normal test now instead of some special PhantomJS version. @wcastand and @guoguo12, is there any cleanup we need to do since we have a Firefox test environment on Travis now?

[guoguo12]

Okay, great. I don't think there's any cleanup that needs to be done.

[zdfs]

Close this one out then?

[guoguo12]

Sure.

[LeaVerou]

Thank you all!
Sorry if this is a silly question, but why Firefox and not Chrome? AFAIK there is a Chrome launcher too…

[zdfs]

Firefox is already on Travis. From what I've read, it seemed like I would need steps to build and install Chrome.

I can try Chrome and see what happens. We can always go back to Firefox.

[zdfs]

I'm curious now. Going to try it.

[LeaVerou]

Given that Chrome has a much higher market share, I’d prioritize that. But if it's too much of a hassle, Firefox is fine!

[zdfs]

Ok. Looks like we can't start Chrome. I can get this to work. I've done it on Wercker. But it's going to take me a few tries. I don't mind.

[zdfs]

Holy shit.

[zdfs]

Chrome is set. Closing this out.

[guoguo12]

Good work!

[dperrymorrow]

@zdfs if we are going to run the suite in Chrome, should i back out that change i made to get $.all to run in headless mode?

the expr.constructor.name vs instanceof business

[zdfs]

You can do that. I can merge something like that as opposed to changes that affect core code.

[LeaVerou]

Thank you so much @zdfs!