Question about plans for remill and ghidra pcode about remill

[2over12]

I dont think the coupling should be too bad between architectures, we would need some configuration of Name.cpp. In an ideal world (imo) we would support a list of arch names to build so if you just wanted sleigh youd do like "-DENABLED_TARGET="amd64_sleigh;aarch64_sleigh" etc

[lkorenc]

Hi,

I don't oppose this - I would love to have a toggle for each architecture separately. It may however need more than just some cmake changes because code is pretty tightly coupled at places making it hard to do this type of split (which is one of the reasons it is not yet implemented).
Not sure what the stance of others is on this.

[frabert]

AFAIK there's no plan to deprecate the existing "native" semantics. I think the ability to import sleigh semantics is more of a shortcut for us to be able to support more architectures more quickly.

I would also not be opposed to this as long as the APIs don't change significantly (preferably at all)