Library maintenance going forward? about pyexchange

[seanson]

It's been a while and I'm just following up! Since I've last addressed this, there has been significant work on UberGrape's fork (https://github.com/ubergrape/pyexchange) and I'd probably put that as the best bet for a new starting place. I've fired off an email to @koniiik to ask him if he agrees, though I am still at a loss of how to contact LinkedIn Engineering (I've given them a shout on Twitter today, maybe that'll do it?).

I've also sent an email to PyContribs (https://github.com/pycontribs) asking if they'd like to re-home this library under their group as it's the only real place I can find for abandoned python projects!

If anyone else has suggestions I'd be glad to hear them.

[stemid]

I think it's time to fork this project for good. @seanson where is this fork you speak of? Right now it seems to me that @pusnik has the most attractive fork I would like to keep working with.

[seanson]

@stemid the fork is linked in the above issue #56 but yes it is the @pusnik fork that I feel has the most value. Is there someone we can reach out to LinkedIn to ask about ownership?

[Achimh3011]

If you want a non-personal place to put such a fork, I'd like to offer pycontribs, which is an organization exactly about saving abandoned projects.

[pusnik]

I totally agree, we need to fork the repo and continue with the development. We are intensively using this library in production so it would be great to keep this repo alive.

[seanson]

I've gotten a response back from UberGrape who are glad to offer their fork as a place to centralise development for the time being. I believe the current pypi policy is not to allow reclaiming of abandoned names but can't find this in writing anywhere so a solution will be needed for that as well, either further attempts to contact LinkedIn or picking a new package name.