Publication on Pypi failing about whisper-timestamped

[Jeronymous]

It finally worked \o/

Thanks again for your kind help @bennyo27

[bennyo27]

I see, we can try manually inputting the pkg-name, as per the instructions here https://github.com/etils-actions/pypi-auto-publish.

name: Auto-publish

on: [push, workflow_dispatch]

jobs:
  publish-job:
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/master'
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      contents: write

    steps:
      - uses: etils-actions/pypi-auto-publish@v1
        with:
          pypi-token: ${{ secrets.PYPI_API_TOKEN }}
          gh-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
          parse-changelog: false
          pkg-name: "package_name"  # Replace with actual package name

[bennyo27]

For that issue, I think we should just be able to use the readme?

with open("README.md", encoding='utf-8') as f:
    long_description = f.read()

setup(
    # Add long description from README file
    long_description=long_description,
    long_description_content_type='text/markdown',

I think there is a way to test github actions locally but I'm not familiar with it
https://github.com/nektos/act

It could be that github actions adds something to the flow of the pypi upload and that's why there are discrepancies in the builds

[Jeronymous]

Thank you @bennyo27
Maybe it was because of the "dash" <-> "underscore" confusion somewhere...

I had another error that I fixed by modifying the setup.py

Getting closer but...
Now there is this one on https://github.com/linto-ai/whisper-timestamped/actions/runs/7144443381/job/19458040933

ERROR    `long_description` has syntax errors in markup and would not be        
         rendered on PyPI.                                                      
         No content rendered from RST source.                                   

I don't see any "long_description" field defined, neither documented somewhere...

Is there by chance a way to test the build locally, without pushing modification?

And I still wonder how it worked with the 2 first builds...

I just wonder how it previously worked for version 1.13.3 ...

[Jeronymous]

Thanks a lot 🙏
I see, long_description is an option of the setup.py
I first try with a simple one, not the README.md, which is quite complicated (and maybe that was the reason of the failure : I suspect it was taking this by default).

[bennyo27]

Thanks a lot 🙏 I see, long_description is an option of the setup.py I first try with a simple one, not the README.md, which is quite complicated (and maybe that was the reason of the failure : I suspect it was taking this by default).

Oh yea that may be why.

[bennyo27]

That is great to hear!