Rename repo? about geostore

[billgeo]

I know it has become a bit of a convention, but do we need the linz bit. It's in the LINZ org already?

[palmerj]

I guess it's nice to have the linz part if we every open source it. The organisation account can be lost a little it the code gets published or replicated to other places.

we should rename the current linz-data-lake to linz-data-lake-old.

[billgeo]

I guess it's nice to have the linz part if we every open source it

Doesn't that imply it's only for LINZ to use though? Couldn't some other org take our code and implement it in their org.

The organisation account can be lost a little it the code gets published or replicated to other places.

Should be in the license/attribution though somewhere shouldn't it? Although I guess that's pretty hidden. What about adding it to the README instead? Less hidden, but could be changed I guess, in a fork.

[imincik]

I guess it's nice to have the linz part if we every open source it

Doesn't that imply it's only for LINZ to use though? Couldn't some other org take our code and implement it in their org.

The organisation account can be lost a little it the code gets published or replicated to other places.

Should be in the license/attribution though somewhere shouldn't it? Although I guess that's pretty hidden. What about adding it to the README instead? Less hidden, but could be changed I guess, in a fork.

LINZ as original author can be mentioned in readme. I don't like prefixing all repos with "linz" either.

[billgeo]

Renamed to Geospatial-Data-Lake-3 and update the README

[imincik]

Thanks