Reseeding doesn't return consistent data for some providers about mimesis

[lk-geimfari]

This is probably a bug. I'll fix this. Thank you for report!

[lk-geimfari]

I fixed the issue only for File, but the bug itself is still there, so I'll reopen this issue.

[lk-geimfari]

This problem requires quite a serious overhaul of some providers.

This is because some providers under the hood use other providers (for example Internet) and when the ".reseed()" method is called it reseeding only the original provider.

[lk-geimfari]

@sobolevn I apologize for the inconvenience, but do you have any eligant solution for this?

[Svenito]

I hope you don't mind me making a couple of suggestions here:

One option would be to override the reseed method for any class that has sub-providers, and reseed those providers there.

Another option would be to iterate over the attributes of a class in the reseed base class method, and reseed any attribute that is a subclass or instance of BaseProvider

The latter might not be as clean, but it would help prevent human error of forgetting to reseed a sub-provider. Plus only requires a change to the BaseProvider

Just some ideas to throw into the ring.

I just tested this the latest master and the issue is no longer there.

>>> g.file.file_name()
'charge.ppt'
>>> g.reseed(1)
>>> g.file.file_name()
'charge.ppt'
>>> g.reseed(1)
>>> g.file.file_name()
'charge.ppt'
>>> g.reseed(1)
>>> g.file.file_name()
'charge.ppt'

Closing issue. Thank you for looking into this

[Svenito]

Hi, I tentatively submitted a PR that reseeds all related providers on the BaseProvider.
Hopefully this is an acceptable way to solve the issue

[lk-geimfari]

I've fixed this bug. Thank you, @Svenito.