final keyword on Client class? about fxmlrpc

[robclancy]

Blow off steam obviously because someone using the final keyword in a retarded way making it so I need to copy paste code instead of extending like a normal person.

[lstrojny]

The idea is to not extend the Client class itself, but rather to decorate it by extending AbstractClientDecorator. Can you elaborate on your use case to see if it is something we are not supporting at the moment?

[mattzuba]

Thanks, I didn't pay attention to that class when I was looking things over. Using that makes this issue null and void. Thanks! :)

[robclancy]

Using final in any package ever to satisfy your own weird philosophies when there are zero security implicates is just... unbelievable.

[lstrojny]

@robclancy let’s agree to disagree and there are other implementations of an XML/RPC client you can use that might better align with your stance. I am also wondering if you really believe your comment would make me reconsider my stance or if you wanted to blow off steam. While I can understand the latter, this is not the place for it.