Porting to NAN about node-gphoto2

[catesq]

Sorry about the all-in-one PR. The main changes are:

• Updated to the current nan.

• Fixed the gphoto.on('log', callback) method - gphoto.setLoglevel 2 and 3 were so verbose that some messages were being dropped by libuv coalescing events.

• getConfig is working again (could only find partial examples and unsure if the object it builds has exactly the same structure...).

• Changed setConfig so it does some basic type conversion and menu/option lookups - especially useful for 'choice' + 'menu' type settings ie on my camera setConfig('capturetarget', 0) now works the same as setConfig('capturetarget', 'Internal RAM').

It passes the tests - apart from a livepreview test that my camera doesn't support. I haven't tried tested it with anything from the examples dir.

[lyonlai]

Alright, here it is. I'll give it a try to make it compile again first.

[lwille]

merged #92 into feature/nan. Thank you all, especially @mitnuh, for your contributions and support!

I'd like to ask for some help with testing (still no camera ☹️):

• Manual tests against current Node LTS with camera on OSX
• Manual tests against current Node LTS with camera on Linux

Please run the tests and use the files from the examples.
Testing against your own project can be done easily by using npm link:

git clone [email protected]:lwille/node-gphoto2.git && cd node-gphoto2
git checkout feature/nan
npm install
npm link
# cd to your project directory
npm link gphoto2

[IvanDhalluin]

It's working fine on OSX (node v7.7.1) with livepreview on my project :) (but the example seems to be broken)

[Sija]

@lwille need any help with the next releases? I could help you with maintenance if you like.

[elijahparker]

@mitnuh: this looks great -- thanks so much! This module has been holding back the node version in my project and I hadn't found the time to tackle this yet, so thank you very much for your work here!

[Sija]

@lwille ping

[Sija]

@lwille 🏓 There are people waiting for this update for almost 3 yrs now...

[dubcanada]

Is feature/nan working? Minus the refactors.

[lwille]

No, it's not - I didn't even test it yet 😊

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:29 PM, dubcanada [email protected]
wrote:

Is feature/nan working? Minus the refactors.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#67 (comment)

[dubcanada]

I am in need of this for a project I am working on. I am debating helping you with the NAN stuff or using node-ffi.

Was there any reason you choose to create C node bindings, rather then using FFI?

[lwille]

As libgphoto2 requires some sort of threading, FFI wasn't an option when I started development. Also, I didn't find a way to easily handle structs (now possible with ref-struct).

I just read that node-ffi meanwhile supports async calls and will definitely reconsider it,
especially because it will reduce most of the compilation hassle and ease up development :)

Have you already done some async work with FFI?

Before making such a choice, it would be great to have some proof of concept (open camera, take picture) using FFI.

There's a similar project done in Ruby (https://github.com/zaeleus/ffi-gphoto2).
I guess some boilerplate (structs!) could be generated with ffi-generate (if that's still working)...

You're very welcome to contribute!

[dubcanada]

I'm going to spend a while over the next two days trying to get a proof of concept working with FFI. I only need open camera, and take photo, and then download photo working for my project so I'll show you that when I get done/working/not working lol

[dubcanada]

Didn't have a lot of luck with the whole node-ffi. A ton of really weird complicated pointers and things in libgpphoto2.

I'll start playing around with your nan version and try to get that to work. I think that's probably a better solution anyways.

[lwille]

Thanks for trying it :)
You'll notice that since removing cvv8, there's no way to retrieve the camera settings. I'd appreciate help on that feature :)

(Just added that to the task list, so we won't forget)

[leroyvi]

Hi lwille

Do you have any news on this subject ? I really like your lib but working with node 0.10 is really annoying.
I will see if I can help but my c++ is very rusty.

[dubcanada]

It largely works with node 0.10+ already with the nan version just a few
things missing.

On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 6:18 am Nataku [email protected] wrote:

Hi lwille

Do you have any news on this subject ? I really like your lib but working
with node 0.10 is really annoying.
I will see if I can help but my c++ is very rusty.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#67 (comment).

[sescandell]

Hi there,

First of all, many thanks for this work. What you've made is so cool!

Just wondering what's the status about Node 0.10+ support?

Any idea when it will be available?

Many thanks,

[elijahparker]

I just saw this thread now -- I've been working porting my fork to nan the last couple weeks (didn't get very far yet). Where is this at now? I'd love to help out if I can. Thanks!

[geloescht]

Any news on this? Right now I am trying to use the gphoto2 cli with child_process. It works well, but I guess a proper node module could be more fool-proof.

[sorenkrabbe]

Just wanted to echo the enthusiasm around @mitnuh's contribution. Can't wait to see the PR merged...

[catesq]

Thanks for testing it Ivan :) the latest pull request seems to get the example working again.

[lwille]

@mitnuh thanks for merging, please make sure to reference this issue (#67) in your future merges ;-) I'll try to get hold of a camera to test on Linux so we can finally release.

[naeluh]

I have a canon 500d that I am going to test this against in ubuntu 14.04 this weekend, I will let you ifi ti works.
thanks !

[IvanDhalluin]

It's working perfectly on Ubuntu for me (tested with 2 Canon).

[Sija]

Seems like it's GTG, yay! Big thanks to @mitnuh for making this happen, and of course to @lwille for keeping an eye and stewardship of this branch.

[rhclayto]

Any news?

[lwille]

@Sija please go ahead! I currently don't have the resources to actively work on this project.