software breakpoints about m65dbg

[Ben-401]

from memory the fpga-side serial-debugger is tightly integrated with the cpu-core.
i would prefer a more significant seperation between the two (if possable).
in this regard, if/when the seperation occurs, your work in the m65dbg for breakpoints may need repairs.
all good for now though..

[gurcei]

Yep, fair enough. I was foreseeing a bit of repair ahead with the recent discussions about refining the comms protocol, so I'll do my best to keep m65dbg commands working nicely with any changes on the hardware.

[gardners]

I'm not sure that further separation is possible, while still maintaining
the functionality, and without adding additional hardware cost, or slowing
the interface down. I'm open to suggestions as to how we might improve it,
though.

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Ben-401 [email protected] wrote:

from memory the fpga-side serial-debugger is tightly integrated with the
cpu-core.
i would prefer a more significant seperation between the two (if possable).
in this regard, if/when the seperation occurs, your work in the m65dbg for
breakpoints may need repairs.
all good for now though..

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#7 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAonT5N5QuDFT6Ey8pGplnw6_O0BYLJgks5qedY0gaJpZM4JfgjJ
.