Enoki PTX linker error about enoki

[PidgeyBE]

Could it be related to this?
https://github.com/mitsuba-renderer/mitsuba2/blob/dbcecba782a228fcda134558f9ae57fa91033967/resources/ptx/Makefile#L4

This seems to specify the compute capability of the GPU and 61 matches the P4 indeed... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUDA

Would it be possible to support more types?
http://arnon.dk/matching-sm-architectures-arch-and-gencode-for-various-nvidia-cards/

[wjakob]

Hi,

you need a Maxwell-class GPU or newer to run Mitsuba's inverse renderer (e.g. GeForce 1080). The bottleneck here is actually not Enoki (it could likely compile and run with a much lower compute capability), but OptiX which requires Maxwell/Turing for the "RTGeometryTriangles" primitive that we depend on.

Best,
Wenzel

[PidgeyBE]

Hi Wenzel

Glad to receive a reaction from the legend himself!
I was reading this page: http://arnon.dk/matching-sm-architectures-arch-and-gencode-for-various-nvidia-cards/

When you compile CUDA code, you should always compile only one ‘-arch‘ flag that matches your most used GPU cards. This will enable faster runtime, because code generation will occur during compilation.
If you only mention ‘-gencode‘, but omit the ‘-arch‘ flag, the GPU code generation will occur on the JIT compiler by the CUDA driver.

and was wondering if this script: https://github.com/mitsuba-renderer/mitsuba2/blob/dbcecba782a228fcda134558f9ae57fa91033967/resources/ptx/Makefile#L4 shouldn't contain the -arch flag to make it more performant?

[wjakob]

We compile to PTX (compute_..) instead of specific device code (sm_..) because this enables the resulting shared library to be moved between systems that potentially have different GPUs. The downside is minimal, a few hundred milliseconds for JIT compilation the first time that Enoki is used. (The resulting native code is cached in ~/.nv in your home directory)

[PidgeyBE]

Aha ok, thanks for the explanation! You say a Maxwell class GPU (or newer) is needed for Optix, but all the GPU's I tested (except K80) are Maxwell or better...

I have the feeling that the code only runs on a GPU with compute capability 61, as the P4 or 1080...

[wjakob]

Aha, that could well be -- maybe we're setting the flag too strictly. Can you try just manually setting it to something smaller? What is the C.C. of the other maxwell devices?

[PidgeyBE]

I've updated the table in my initial post with the C.C's.
I've changed https://github.com/mitsuba-renderer/mitsuba2/blob/dbcecba782a228fcda134558f9ae57fa91033967/resources/ptx/Makefile this file (61 -> 50) and did

make clean
make all

Now I'm rebuilding mitsuba2 on my laptop (GeForce 940M, Maxwell, with CC=5.0) 🤞
I know this hardware is not ideal, but I just want to do some basic tests at this point...

[PidgeyBE]

Still exactly the same error...

PTX linker error:
ptxas fatal : SM version specified by .target is higher than default SM version assumed
cuda_check(): driver API error = 0400 "CUDA_ERROR_INVALID_HANDLE" in ../ext/enoki/src/cuda/jit.cu:253.

I'm wondering where the "SM version" is still defined....

[merlinND]

In CMake, there's a variable called ENOKI_CUDA_COMPUTE_CAPABILITY which you could try and set to match your change in the Makefile you pointed out:

enoki/CMakeLists.txt

Line 15 in 02b224d

set(ENOKI_CUDA_COMPUTE_CAPABILITY "61" CACHE STRING "Compute capability as specified by https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpus")

[PidgeyBE]

Hey Merlin
Thanks! That did the job (together with the other fix)!
I can now run the cbox example on my laptop's Geforce 940M! :)

Should I create a PR for this, or do you guys prefer keeping it as is?

[wjakob]

Yes, that would be great -- please make a PR that downgrades the compute capabilities to the minimal version known to work.

[PidgeyBE]

mitsuba-renderer/mitsuba2#53
#71