Support other Jeepney I/O options? about secretstorage

[mitya57]

Hi!

I'm all for it — but I don't have much time, nor a use case that needs it. The biggest user of SecretStorage is Python-Keyring, and that library doesn't have any asynchronous API.

If I were writing SecretStorage from scratch (using Jeepney), I would probably design API in such a way that one can use it with different I/O options. But the current API was designed when it was using dbus-python, and then I ported from that to Jeepney trying to remain compatible.

So let's keep this issue open. If someone chimes in and says that they have a use case for SecretStorage with a different I/O option, I will try to implement it.

[takluyver]

That makes sense - compatibility is definitely important for something like this, and I understand having limited time. As and when I have some time to spare myself, I might look into what it would take to do this without breaking the documented API.

[mitya57]

Of course I will gladly accept pull requests!

Also adding new API is fine. Marking old as deprecated is also fine.