IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS PROJECT MODERNIZED PLEASE UPVOTE about go-http-tunnel

[tmack8080]

A container?

[hons82]

Websockets

[jlandowner]

Glad to hear revival👍
My suggestions are

• Single binary (and container) which has client and server mode.
• Webhook when new clients are added to the server.
• client configuration via command line options like server mode.

[1ubuntuuser]

I have about 30 clients connected to a tunneld server. My suggestions are:

• CLI for managing certificates
• CLI for reporting connected clients

[AnorBanantje]

support http/3

[lneuman]

Thanks @mmatczuk @hons82 <3

Are there plans to modernize this project, or to otherwise maintain it?

[hons82]

Glad to see that the new commit does contain already some code for the websocket support.

[1ubuntuuser]

A container?

There is a PR for this #41

[sahil-lakhwani]

Glad to see that the new commit does contain already some code for the websocket support.

Any hints on how to use that @hons82 ?

[hons82]

Glad to see that the new commit does contain already some code for the websocket support.

Any hints on how to use that @hons82 ?

I'm using my own fork in production. I guess that the commit isn't complete yet. The Upgrade methods are there, but not yet called in any place. We probably have to wait a few more commits.

[m2acgi]

Single binary which has client and server mode, support run with command line only without the conf file.

[hons82]

Are there plans to modernize this project, or to otherwise maintain it?

Was anybody able to compile it with the current go version?