Question about use of DSL object's private method about docile

[ms-ati]

Hi @taichi-ishitani thank you for using the library and asking this question!

My current view is:
(a) this is desired behavior
(b) it should be documented and covered by tests

I'd be interested in understanding the motivation for private methods of the DSL object to be accessible? That doesn't seem like an ideal usage pattern for this library to be encouraging?

[taichi-ishitani]

Hi @ms-ati ,
Thanks for your comment and I understand your thought.

the motivation for private methods of the DSL object to be accessible

My motivation is rather than for alternate of #instance_eval.
I often use Docile.dsl_eval instead of #instance_eval because both of receiver's methods and block context's methods can be used so I'd like Docile.dsl_eval to behave like '#instance_eval' for this use case . Therefore, I asked you this question.

[taichi-ishitani]

Hi @ms-ati ,

This ticket is just to confirm your view.
Now, I understand your view so I'm closing this ticket.