Comments (5)
Thanks for bringing this up!
We will definitely incorporate this, as soon as it is published by an authoritative journal on taxonomy, which the Journal of Clinical Microbiology is not. The AMR
package only includes taxonomic names that were formally published in taxonomic journals. I’ll explain a bit how this works.
Taxonomic name changes come in at least two stages: explaining the taxonomic importance and consequences, and explaining any other importance and/or consequence (such as clinical ones). A methodological taxonomic paper will probably follow from these authors, which will then be peer-reviewed by taxonomists. This might take some years though.
A great example is the renaming of some strains of non-aureus staphylococci into Staphylococcus pettenkoferi. It was described for the first time in Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease in 2002 (link), but it was not before 2007 that a publication in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) followed (link). As a consequence:
mo_year("S. pettenkoferi")
#> [1] 2007
It does not return 2002 (the year of the first paper), but 2007 (the year of the formal taxonomic publication). For the Candida paper you mentioned this will be the same. Although theoretically, the taxonomic paper might get rejected and never published, as it could be the their taxonomic renaming makes sense clinically but not taxonomically. We have to await that.
We don’t incorporate manual changes, we rely on external, reliable sources.
from amr.
Thanks for the info. I am not an expert on taxonomy. I think that this nomenclature will catch on due to its clinical relevance (c glabrata and c krusei). But i see your point. The automatic determination systems (Maldi Bruker) are going to use it. I suspect that the average user of AMR does not want to wait 5 years....
from amr.
I’m a specialist neither, but learned a lot about taxonomy for the development of our package - we wanted it to be as solid as it could possibly be, also with regard to the taxonomy of microorganisms.
But wow, I’m a bit shocked that Bruker will implement it anyway. Are you sure? It’s not quite the best practice to change taxonomy based on one paper, that would lead to a huge fragmentation of different ‘truths’ if everybody would do that.
Let’s see where this goes :)
from amr.
I’ll reopen this since we now rely on GBIF and there’s increasingly more known/debated about this.
For example, https://twitter.com/jgpharmd/status/1573354689437241344
Summary paper Borman et al 2021, JCM: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111128/
And their erratum: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092722/
from amr.
This update is not part of the current ‘backbone taxonomy’ of GBIF 2022 (doi 10.15468/39omei).
This will be added automatically if GBIF has incorporated it using our new automated script, but since they update their taxonomy yearly it will not happen before the end of 2023...
from amr.
Related Issues (20)
- help with %like% HOT 3
- as.sir function not found HOT 2
- Possibility of adding EUCAST ECOFF values HOT 9
- Clinical breakpoints for *Burkholderia mallei* and *Burkholderia pseudomallei* for all antibiotic might be wrong HOT 2
- Breakpoints prefer PK/PD
- NA converted to first defined custom micro-organism HOT 5
- UTI coding not being recognised in SIR interpretation HOT 12
- First isolate: ICU filtering based on wrong ordering
- typo in function name in tutorial for "Predicting future antimicrobial resistance using regression models" HOT 3
- In `clinical_breakpoints`, some values in `ref_tbl` are missing
- Problem with getting S. coagulans instead of old S. schleiferi coagulans
- `minimum_matching_score` not always considered
- Update clinical_breakpoints to WHONET 2023
- Rework EUCAST Expert Rules HOT 1
- how are IE cut-offs used in MIC graphs HOT 7
- Add `mo_pathogenicity()` HOT 1
- EUCAST rules where there shouldn't be interpretations HOT 3
- g.test doesn't handle zero counts HOT 4
- set body site for SIR intepretation HOT 6
- strange results, when using first isolate() HOT 3
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from amr.