[Suggestion] Trigger the execution of userscripts in a similar way as scriptlets about nanocore

[jspenguin2017]

We would need collaboration from them. Nano Defender can alter Nano Adblocker's settings only because Nano Adblocker explicitly allow that. Nano Defender cannot change uBO's settings.

[jspenguin2017]

Those Userscript engines have their own path matching logic, I don't see when would this be needed.
Also, the developer community here is by no mean large, me and maybe 3 other people who drop a couple lines of code now and then, that's it.

[elypter]

there are many scripts that match all website because they do something generic. however they might break something on some sites, are useful depending on content but not tied to a small set of websites, depend on user preference... you could include a huge list of domains in the userscript and try to keep them updated but this doesnt scale very well and there is also no way to switch them on/off in any gui and even if there was then you would have to store that information in a separate file because otherwise it would be overwritten on every update. managing these sorts of problems is the perfect regime for a filterlist based adblocker.

[jspenguin2017]

but this doesnt scale very well

It's up to Userscript manager to optimize that.
Userscript managers can very well carry an efficient filtering engine with them.

there is also no way to switch them on/off in any gui

Userscript managers definitely have place to add user-defined white/black list, either way, it's up to Userscript managers to implement an accessible UI.

[jspenguin2017]

It sounds like you should fork an Userscript manager and improve it.

I personally don't use Userscript, I have all special logics I need packed in one personal extension, it is way more powerful than Userscript and way more reliable too.

[jspenguin2017]

I don't thinks this is something Nano should worry about, if Userscript managers don't work well, it's their developer's job to improve them.