Default colorscheme incorrect about neovim

[glepnir]

default colorscheme has been changed in head . please try nightly verison.

[zeertzjq]

What is the content of minimal.lua?

[justinmk]

Neovim version (nvim -v)

0.9.5, also 0.7.2-7 (debian bookworm)

[marcin-szmagara]

What is the content of minimal.lua?

Unchanged https://github.com/neovim/neovim/blob/master/contrib/minimal.lua
Now I can see that it does nothing, sorry for the confusion.

default colorscheme has been changed in head . please try nightly verison.

In nightly, when I type :colorscheme vim it doesn't actually look like vim.

I also checked on a clean debian bookworm installation in a virtual machine using nightly in xfce4-terminal.

[justinmk]

In nightly, when I type :colorscheme vim it doesn't actually look like vim.

what does :set bg? say in both ? try changing it.

[marcin-szmagara]

what does :set bg? say in both ? try changing it.

Indeed that was my original issue. In 0.95 typing :colorscheme default changed background from light to dark.

However, in nightly, the vim colorscheme is different than default in 0.95, even when for both background=light.

[justinmk]

However, in nightly, the vim colorscheme is different than default in 0.95

different exactly how? show a screenshot, or say exactly what is different

[clason]

Indeed that was my original issue. In 0.95 typing :colorscheme default changed background from light to dark.

However, in nightly, the vim colorscheme is different than default in 0.95, even when for both background=light.

This is not a bug but an intentional change. Please read :h news.

[marcin-szmagara]

different exactly how? show a screenshot, or say exactly what is different

Left is 0.95, right is nightly.

Apparently the difference is in set termguicolors.

[clason]

Yes. That is an intentional behavior change, as you would have realized had you read :news (which is required reading for anyone following HEAD or upgrading to a new version).