Empty Provider about edrsilencer

[k4nfr3]

Hi,
that's the filter rule name, not the provider name ;-)

[netero1010]

Hi. I believe adding provider to the custom rule will help in OPSEC perspective. I will check if it is better to get existing provider or creating a new one. I will include this to my to-do list in the next update. Thanks @k4nfr3 and @pbssubhash.

[pbssubhash]

The following code: https://github.com/netero1010/EDRSilencer/blob/main/EDRSilencer.c#L62 is used to manage the filter name with which rules are created. You can modify this with your custom (or existing) filter name.

[pbssubhash]

My bad. misread as filter.

I think it's possible: by doing something like filter.providerKey = (GUID*)&WFPSAMPLER_PROVIDER; here: https://github.com/netero1010/EDRSilencer/blob/main/EDRSilencer.c#L147-L157

While I play around, I'd wait for @netero1010 to check the references above and see if it's an easy fix for him.

[netero1010]

Updated in version 1.2. A new WFP provider will be created for the custom WFP filter.