Comments (4)
Just a note that ofborg does not use the flake in this repo for evaluating / etc nixpkgs. It uses the checkout of the PR it's operating on (and/or the master
nixpkgs at the time of operation). The flake only affects building the ofborg software, nothing else.
from ofborg.
This (#648) PR might be a step towards resolving the issue for the Rust part.
from ofborg.
The flake only affects building the ofborg software, nothing else.
No doubt on that (apart from maybe also running ofborg
, interfacing to GitHub etc.), but since 22.05
doesn't build anymore (see e.g. NixOS/nixpkgs#277064, NixOS/nixpkgs#277158) and can't be updated (see NixOS/nixpkgs#277064 (comment)), this blocks building ofborg
. If there is no need for up-to-date packages for building, having an LTS release (see https://discourse.nixos.org/t/interest-in-a-nixos-lts/4705) might reduce ofborg
maintenance costs, but with the current ecosystem, updating seems to be the most straight-forward solution.
from ofborg.
Can we at least merge that PR? It is a really bad sign that our CI is in such a bad state.
from ofborg.
Related Issues (20)
- Update `hyper` rust dependency
- `@ofborg test foo` in PR description does nothing HOT 1
- Updating to nix >=2.16 fails during tests
- ofborg fails nondeterministically HOT 6
- Matrix notifications HOT 1
- Build `tests.*` listed as changed paths HOT 2
- Detect what to build based on touched file paths
- Builders sometimes don't have enough space in the build dir for kernel builds
- ofborg does not use `$attr.meta.maintainers` when `$attr` is in the commit message HOT 1
- How to reproduce jobs locally? -> improve logs HOT 3
- Ping maintainers when they get removed
- generic error: found empty hash, assuming sha256-aaa...
- ofborg doesn't apply changes from PR before kicking off builds on aarch64-darwin sometimes. HOT 3
- error: a 'x86_64-linux' … is required … but I am a 'aarch64-darwin' HOT 3
- Granular requiredSystemFeatures: build individual attributes in passthru.tests HOT 1
- `@ofborg test foo` in a "review comment" does nothing
- labeling for "11.by package-maintainter" didn't detect me as maintainer in nixpkgs
- Don't request maintainer review of closed PR
- Allow unfree redistributable builds?
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from ofborg.