Labelling Issues / PRs about modules

[MylesBorins]

I'm imagining the interop flag would be paired with the cjs, esm, and web-platform tags as appropriate

[WebReflection]

interoperability: cjs <-> esm interop or node <-> browser interop

I think there is a distinction between web-interop and cjs-interop with ESM (which is still the implicit major goal to ship here).

Do you see those two cases as commonly being grouped together?
If not, maybe worth the split?
If yes, 👍 for me

[SMotaal]

FYI I did a bit of color-coordination here to make sure that:

1. labels used for counterpart indications use a shared color
2. change colors as needed to enhance contrast to promote easy (and pleasing) reading
3. attempt to find colors that symbolize labels (at least not ones that contradict them)

[SMotaal]

Symbolical

Label	Indication	Description
#ffffcc	doc	—
#dd2277	duplicate	This issue or pull request already exists
#ccff88	no/go?	one-off "not pro forma" actions

Arbitrary

Label	Indication	Description
#dfe539	tsc-agenda	To be discussed by the technical committee
#118811	modules-agenda	To be discussed in a meeting
#fbca04	modules-review	To be reviewed by team in github thread

Categorical

Label	Indications
#ffcc33	cjs esm
#99ee77	interoperability web-platform
#dd3300	discussion errata proposal
#006699	terminology surveys features
#1177cc	events membership roadmap
#99eebb	meeting-notes meta

---

FYI — Rendering color patches

​

Github renders a color patch for inline code ​`#ffffcc`​ like this #ffffcc.

It is also possible, but somewhat irresponsible to use an image service like placehold.it like this .