arbtt-stats --intervals UTC? about arbtt

[nomeata]

Original comment by nomeata (Bitbucket: nomeata, GitHub: nomeata).

---

Indeed, it is UTC there. I guess that is mostly laziness on my part (I will have to pass the timezone down to the relevant function), but should be no problem. I’ll look into it; as I mentioned I’m currently traveling.

[nomeata]

Original comment by amenthes (Bitbucket: amenthes, GitHub: amenthes).

---

If it is always UTC, i am not at all against this. In that case, it would just need a notice in the docs. What i certainly would like to avoid would be "undefinedness" as in "you get some output, but you can't tell what exactly it is".

[nomeata]

Original comment by Michał J Gajda (Bitbucket: [Michal J. Gajda](https://bitbucket.org/Michal J. Gajda), ).

---

Fixed in my branch: https://bitbucket.org/mgajda/arbtt/commits/c69448224b29476b91456e3c844d979e6aae4a98

[nomeata]

Original comment by nomeata (Bitbucket: nomeata, GitHub: nomeata).

---

This has been merged into master, and released in 0.10.1.

[nomeata]

Original comment by amenthes (Bitbucket: amenthes, GitHub: amenthes).

---

This is what I was afraid of. Now the worst of two combinations has happened (and this is the exact opposite of what this ticket was about):

a) it is still not documented what the expected format is (documentation has not changed).
b) the format of that output changed without advance notice from UTC to local timezone.

Additionally, there is no way to get back the old way, in case anyone depends on the specific output.

Did anyone test what happens to the output with regard to daylight savings time? Let's say I'm running this command in december (Where I am in UTC+01:00) and want to see intervals from september (where they have been recorded in UTC+02:00) what happens now? At least with UTC (and before merging this) it was consistently UTC.

[nomeata]

Original comment by nomeata (Bitbucket: nomeata, GitHub: nomeata).

---

Dates are hard :-/

[nomeata]

Original comment by Michał J Gajda (Bitbucket: [Michal J. Gajda](https://bitbucket.org/Michal J. Gajda), ).

---

@Amenthes Is it another bug report, or rather documentation request?