Add bun/runtime to nx labs about nx-labs

[gunta]

Jarred is openly saying that "...if code doesn't work in Bun but does in Node, it's a bug in Bun." -

My concern is that there will be too many issues opened

I believe the above Bun policy is enough of peace-mind to redirect any issue to the Bun repo and keep track of them as they get fixed.

https://x.com/jamonholmgren/status/1707784581758492947

[gunta]

Target developer population

Besides this, we also have to consider the target developer population.

However, I believe it's still too immature, similar to Deno requests.

While both are "immature" people are already using both in production and making real money.

Deno history

Deno adoption has been very slow, its main selling points are the module system and security.
Not exactly performance.

Bun history

Developers using Bun are actively looking for fast install, build performance.
Better runtime performance is just a plus.

Bun adoption is already at a higher pace than both Node and Deno.

Bun and Nx common audience

So both Bun users and Nx have the same shared goals: faster builds.
Nx definitely aligns well with Bun goals, and with developers who care about CI build time.

So if Nx doesn't supports Bun natively, I believe the target developer audience might start looking somewhere (such as https://moonrepo.dev )

[Jordan-Hall]

Worry is looking at the package manager there already missing commands. I still think labs is the best place for it as its experimental still as node compatibility isn't 1 to 1 yet