Hi Nicola,
a question came up on [TeX.Stackexchange](http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/223607/37907) [1] where a user used the classical bibliography setup to get his references into the CV. As the default is a starred section, the result is not satisfying. One can get around this by using a _numbered section_, as shown in the answer i gave myself.
I am not sure if you want to address the issue.
Best regards
Johannes Böttcher
[1] http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/223607/does-the-bibliography-command-specify-a-section-anywhere
Hi Johannes,
thanks for letting me know. Are you willing to provide a suggestion in a pull-request form?
It could break backward compatibility if needed. I'm using this class for ten or so private resumes, so updating all of them is not a big issue.
I would simply use the `\KOMAoption{bibliography}{totocnumbered}` as in the answer i gave at TeX.SX. If a user decides to have a bibliography, he won't see any difference as nothing is numbered anyway. But internally, a `section` (rather than `section*`) is used. This will even work for `biblatex` as it processes the keywords.
Well, pull requests make things such as credits and contributions identification a lot more clear.
If you are not interested I'll reference your help in the commit message, like in the good ol' days.