Legal test cannot be parsed because of set-locators.xsl about eo

[levBagryansky]

@yegor256 WDYT

[maxonfjvipon]

@levBagryansky it should not be legal, comments in front of anonymous (without name) abstract object should be prohibited

[levBagryansky]

@maxonfjvipon if I remove comments, will be ok?

[maxonfjvipon]

@levBagryansky speaking about taking attribute from abstract object - seems legal

[maxonfjvipon]

@maxonfjvipon if I remove comments, will be ok?

@levBagryansky I think so, but not 100% sure

[yegor256]

@levBagryansky I think, this should be legal:

# Test
[] > experements
  .say > @
    []
      TRUE > say

[levBagryansky]

@yegor256 @maxonfjvipon such test cannot be parsed by eo-maven-plugin:

# Test
[] > experements
  .say > @
    []
      TRUE > say

[ERROR] Failed to parse '/home/tardis3/eo/eo-runtime/src/test/eo/org/eolang/cage-tests.eo:206': [206:2] no viable alternative at input '# Test\n[] > experements\n  INT.': "  .say > @"
[INFO] Parsed 26 .eo sources to XMIRs
[INFO] Optimized 26 out of 26 XMIR program(s)
[ERROR] net.sf.saxon.style.XSLMessage@884f1e2: This transformation must be applied only after you remove @method attributes from objects, using 'wrap-method-calls.xsl'
[ERROR] #fatalError(): Processing terminated by xsl:message at line 82 in set-locators.xsl; SystemID: file:///org/eolang/parser/set-locators.xsl; Line#: 82; Column#: 36
[ERROR] Processing terminated by xsl:message at line 82 in set-locators.xsl
[ERROR] 'org.eolang.maven.ShakeMojo@7d38f2ec' execution failed
[ERROR] Processing terminated by xsl:message at line 82 in set-locators.xsl
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

[yegor256]

@levBagryansky try this one instead:

# This is an experimental object with a good enough documentation block
[] > experements
  .say > @
    []
      TRUE > say

[maxonfjvipon]

@levBagryansky dot in reversed notation must be AFTER the object, not BEFORE it:

# This is an experimental object with a good enough documentation block.
[] > experements
  say. > @
    []
      TRUE > say

[levBagryansky]

@maxonfjvipon Thanks, your example works.
Btw, such example does not work

# This is an experimental object with a good enough documentation block.
[] > experements
  say. > @
    # Commentary.
    []
      TRUE > say

[maxonfjvipon]

@levBagryansky because you use comment in front of abstract object without name, which is prohibited
This should work:

# This is an experimental object with a good enough documentation block.
[] > experements
  say. > @
    # Commentary.
    [] > x
      TRUE > say

[levBagryansky]

@maxonfjvipon ok, thanks