Potential bug: output of Tesseract (C-API) and Tesseract (sh) is different about pyocr

[mathiasimmer]

Maybe I should add an example where the output is there same:

gives:

Using pyocr tool 'Tesseract (C-API)'
l/Z
Using pyocr tool 'Tesseract (sh)'
l/Z

Which was more like what I would've expected. Ignore that the text is wrong; I know how to fix that, but at least the output is consistent.

[jflesch]

I observed a similar problems when making the tests. The output of libtesseract and tesseract (sh) are slightly different. Quite frankly I'm not sure where this difference comes from.

Currently, my main theory is that it comes from the way images are read:

• with libtesseract, the input image is loaded by PIllow, turned into a raw image and then passed directly to libtesseract.
• With tesseract (sh), Pillow read the image, save it back as a .bmp, then tesseract loads this .bmp using libleptonica and pass it raw to Tesseract.
  Maybe somewhere there is a slight difference in the way images are encoded / decoded that makes the OCR reacts differently.

[amitdo]

I don't know if it's related to this issue, but one difference between tesseract and libtesseract is the default psm. The default psm in tesseract is '3', while in libtesseract it's '6'.

https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract/blob/cdc35338c53a1af1fcb95473445f2aabfdb3f6d1/api/tesseractmain.cpp#L222

[jflesch]

Good point. It might explain the differences. I'll have a look later.