Intel compiler optimization about openradioss

[Fonotec]

I will share this plot which shows some of the options (not complete list of what is possible), this was performed on a Intel Xeon processor, this is a bit older model (a few years old). This also shows variation as a function of number of cores to see how well the scaling of the code performs for a cantilever beam simulation with around 20.000 shell elements (I would not expect it to scale very well beyond 4 cores). Here you can see that adding Ofast, adding xHost and removing the -ax... line reduces the CPU time. Adding -static does not improve noticeable compared to -Ofast on this plot. The black vertical line indicates a factor of two in the total CPU time.

Compiler_comparisons_CPU_time.pdf

Note that the speed-up might be even bigger on newer CPUs.

[Fonotec]

As requested the details of the CPU are: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6234 CPU @ 3.30GHz (x86_64), 3300 MHz, 515398 MB RAM

[elequiniou]

Thanks a lot for the finding! This is really interesting.
We are investigating to reproduce and understand better from which option(s) the improvement is coming and if it changes the numerical answer.
The generic options we provided allow to run on many platforms. Using -xhost when the compilation and run machine is the same sounds a good tip.