Group and Report Totals about saiku

[all4miller]

+1 this will be really nice

[all4miller]

Where is this on the priority list? Keeps coming up with our user base.

[goncalvesr2]

+1 for totals on displayed values, would be great.

[alaindebecker]

That one is a must.
Or maybe; I missed something in the user guide.

[pstoellberger]

you can view the totals by clicking on the "hide parents icon" in the toolbar

for visual totals we will have an option as well soon
i also have plans to display the totals of a all rows / all columns

[alaindebecker]

Thanks Paul.
Works fine for me.

The Total first option may be a surprise for user expecting the report format.
However it is far more natural for analysis (and a competitve distinction).

Draging in and out the "(all)" category is very handy.

Possibly -- on the long term priority list -- make totals more visible (bold, border-top,...) or a very neat format I saw once in an Insurance company: indent-left... The Business Analysits did love to look the total first then the detail, and were able to navigate comfortably trough 5 level of detail.

Mitarbeiter (All) Spesen Betrag

Lichtenhahn Martin All Expenses 3407.00
Verpflegung 782.90
Unterkunft 743.75
Bahn, Tram, Bus, Taxi 1760.10
Projektkosten 120.25

Meili Eric All Expenses 3097.10
Unterkunft 1462.00
etc

[pstoellberger]

i cant really see the format in your post but highlighting is on the todo as well

[alaindebecker]

Paul,
You probably saw it.

I admit, it is so unusual that most people think it is a formatting problem.
But I can garantee that Business Analysts (unlike Accountants) get soon
addicted.

Technically, replace by or by
+=     

But do not start your todo just for that. The functionality is here, the
cosmetic will follow.

Thanks for your Saiku,
AlainD
[image: Inline image 3]

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Paul Stoellberger
[email protected]:

i cant really see the format in your post but highlighting is on the todo
as well

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/50#issuecomment-11086965.