Comments (4)
Okay, these testnets should not have made it into the json 🙈
You are right that they should not have their own prefix. I would more like to support them in the json, but they will use 42
as prefix. We could probably introduce some new optional testnet: true
field for each entry.
We should probably not add every test net, but the main ones like Westend and Rococo and some of the community.
If we have the testnet
identifier, you should be able to filter them better in the UI?
from ss58-registry.
Hello everyone,
Thank you for the comments, as far as I understand, adding Westend should not make any issues for Polkadot js extension, moreover, Westend is already available on Polkadot.js.org.
What I need is to have Westend in "Polkadot js Plus extension", Now, I manually add it to the json file, and every other developers to build the code from the source need to add it manually which is cumbersome.
I believe supporting major testnets like Westend, which obviously have no cost for users, let them to try/learn different features/concepts of Polkadot ecosystem (like bonding, unbonding, chill, redeem, nominate , existential deposit, transferAll, etc.) that we know is sometimes complicated. This will definitely help to grow the community.
Cheers,
Kami
from ss58-registry.
Yes. With a flag I will just adjust the filtering, so it is no cost at all. (And better since the existing filters can then be made explicit)
from ss58-registry.
I actually actively filter out all testnets, so they don't appear in any lists in the @polkadot/*
packages. There are some testnets in the current registry, e.g.
ss58-registry/ss58-registry.json
Lines 202 to 210 in eb89e2f
For those I keep a list and match them to filter out (also matching on text such as -testnet
in addition to this list) -
The issue with these are that they just create a major PITA -
- they get reset and their genesis changes
- they get abandoned and/or replaced
- the clog up any UI selections
- ... they shouldn't really have ss58 prefixes
from ss58-registry.
Related Issues (11)
- New Substrate docs do not contain the SS58 spec & details.
- Next steps HOT 2
- Does this allow duplicative prefix? HOT 1
- Tag & publish HOT 2
- Publish to npmjs registry HOT 2
- [CI] cargo-unleash runs successfully but returns error
- Update Totem and add Totem Parachain [Kapex]
- std-leackage? HOT 2
- when run cargo bump minor, return error? HOT 1
- Renumber Totem Kapex to fit within u8
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from ss58-registry.