option to generate an es module instead of commonjs module about pegjs

[hildjj]

Yes, it's resolved in Peggy. We're working toward a first release within days, I hope.

[GreenImp]

I'm not sure, but from the PR description, this may have been resolved on the Peggy fork: peggyjs/peggy#11

It looks like Peggy is gaining some momentum as an active replacement for pegjs.

[GreenImp]

That's fantastic! Really nice to see this project coming back to life.

[mreinstein]

oh wow, that is fantastic news. pegjs has one of the most pleasant syntaxes, so I'm really happy to see peggy breathe new life into it! Will head over there and start exploring. :)

[hildjj]

We just did a pre-release version of peggy, 1.0.0-rc.0. Can a few of you try this out in your existing projects, please? We'll do a full release as soon as we have a few data points.

[stoneRdev]

@hildjj I might try it, if it's suitable as a drop in replacement for PEGjs. Meaning if I don't have to change any of my grammars or actions, I'll give it a try

[mreinstein]

I've definitely been meaning to try this in my own project, just haven't gotten to it yet mreinstein/constraint-solver#5

[hildjj]

The intent is that you just s/pegjs/peggy/g and nothing changes other than you get support. :)

[hildjj]

An example, on one of my projects: hildjj/resolv-conf@e175e13

[mreinstein]

I'll try to find some time this afternoon to take it for a spin, I'm definitely keen/excited to try this, just overworked at the moment. :)

[stoneRdev]

Well, as far as the online version goes, it all checks out, so consider me migrated

[mreinstein]

Same, I'm migragted to peggy!