testing recommendation about rwb

[petermoresi]

Mocha is a great tool. I use tape. Mocha is valid but not everybody wants to standardize on a test framework.

[bobzoller]

yeah sorry, I was probably a little confusing. I threw out the example of
my own setup just for context. my point behind this PR is not to bless a
testing stack, but rather to discuss/discover a good way to test rwb apps
using the same build tooling that my rwb app uses.

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Peter Moresi [email protected]
wrote:

Mocha is a great tool. I use tape. Mocha is valid but not everybody wants
to standardize on a test framework.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#24 (comment)

[bobzoller]

a coworker just showed me how in test, he uses a webpack dev server configured exactly the same as development except that it doesn't include the app entrypoint -- and then karma runs the test file(s) itself and depends on that webpack bundle.

so the question I've yet to answer: is it useful (in a test framework independent way, per @petermoresi's comment) to bake-in the building of that test asset to rwb?