Time-dependent Magnetic Coils - limited to 1? about piclas

[scopplestone]

In your scenario, would you consider two or more coils running at a different or at the same frequency?
I think this could be implemented quite easily depending on your case.

[DoviShamir]

In the scenario I envisage the coils (more than two) would be running at the same frequency but in different phases.

…

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 13:29, Stephen Copplestone ***@***.***> wrote: In your scenario, would you consider two or more coils running at a different or at the same frequency? I think this could be implemented quite easily depending on your case. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARDH7MKSOBG6AXEL77QBV2DU4I43TANCNFSM5OSNJISA> . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[scopplestone]

I have made the required changes to allow using an arbitrary number of time-dependent coils. It will only work when all these coils use the same frequency as different frequencies would have required making significant changes to the code, e.g., finding a common time span of multiple different periods or using multiple containers, one for each time-dependent coil. The next minor Release version 2.7.0 will contain the new features. The example in the picture will be located within the regression check directory under

/regressioncheck/NIG_SuperB/CircularCoilTimeDependentMulti

[pnizenkov]

2.7.0 is released including this feature, closing the issue!