Comments (7)
Maybe separate unsure/NA since they are actually different values?
from rapid-prereview.
yes we are currently considering 4 options:
- yes
- no
- not applicable
- I don't know
from rapid-prereview.
@sballesteros Some updates here. I was trying to cut down the number a little and also realized that some additional clarification may be helpful (I add messages to show when hovering over the questions). I can definitely come back to this and edit more, but I think this is a little better. And "yes" should be uniformly a good thing.
Are the findings novel?
On hover: In your judgement, does the manuscript have information that has not been previously known or published?
Are the principal conclusions supported by the data and analysis?
On hover: Is there sufficient evidence to support the key findings of the manuscript?
Are the results likely to lead to future research?
On hover: Do the data, findings, or analysis point to clear directions for additional research?
Have the authors adequately discussed ethical concerns?
On hover: For example, if a human study, is Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval presented?
Does the manuscript discuss limitations?
On hover: Are the most important limitations clearly presented?
Does the manuscript include new data?
On hover: Were data collected or made available specifically for this study?
Are the data used in the manuscript openly available?
On hover: In the paper, supplement, on a public repository, or from a cited source?
Is sufficient detail provided in the methods allow reproduction of the study?
Are the methods and statistics appropriate for the analysis?
Would you recommend this manuscript to others?
On hover: Consider any possible audience: scientists in the same field or others, policy makers, the public, etc.
Do you recommend this manuscript for peer review?
On hover: Would you recommend this manuscript to a journal editor for formal peer review?
Technical comments on methods, data, limitations (optional, limit XXX characters)
Editorial comments on novelty, importance, relevance (optional, limit XXX characters)
from rapid-prereview.
For required checkboxes, will need to think through the options. yes, no, or unsure/NA? Or make not required and just count checks?
from rapid-prereview.
good point a radio with yes | no | unsure/NA starting from a blank state should do so we can do validation on it and know that user processed the question.
from rapid-prereview.
Yes, definitely value to collecting all. I think it will be helpful to look at a mockup of this. I could see 'only checkbox for yes' being a helpful option only if the form starts getting crowded.
from rapid-prereview.
Sorry to come late to this conversation. I like the options @sballesteros just laid out. I'd say some questions will require the other + _____ checkbox? For example the question about special attention. But maybe we want to specifically avoid that because it's hard to group data if we allow for free options?
from rapid-prereview.
Related Issues (20)
- Complete dashboard front end HOT 4
- Hook up Dashboard API HOT 2
- Create a RSS Export HOT 7
- Extension bug: When asked to login on OSrPRE via extension it redirects to website HOT 15
- Enhancement: Improve ResearchSquare Preprint display HOT 11
- Search should probably be fuzzy not exact HOT 2
- Craft a query to lookup multiple search terms in preprint titles HOT 3
- Dashboard UX: Add conditional asking users to login when attempting to add or request review HOT 3
- Extension: rapid review form does not show the data quesiton with option to paste the link to data
- Add extension banner to the hompage HOT 5
- Edit language in OSrPRE's red Call to Action banner
- In Chrome but not in Firefox problem loading the pdf of a new preprint HOT 3
- Delete all requests for review by Katrina Murphy public and private profile
- Update About page with new content HOT 1
- Delete the Give Feedback banner HOT 1
- Get number of reviews and requests updated at the top of the search HOT 2
- Review drawer doesn't show-up with Chrome browser extension HOT 1
- Uncheck Code of Conduct agreement box at login
- Share new API information HOT 1
- Make sure the login via ORCID iD works with the new codebase HOT 1
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from rapid-prereview.