GithubHelp home page GithubHelp logo

Comments (4)

volumetric avatar volumetric commented on May 21, 2024

are you talking about a more generic advanced search option, like what
popular web search engines provide. i think that will be a good feature.
since not all torrent search engine can process such logical search query
results. this will need to be done locally from the set of results that
gets returned from the search providers.

take a look at google advanced search option:
https://www.google.co.in/advanced_search?q=games&hl=en&biw=1366&bih=656&prmd=imvns

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:50 PM, teo83 [email protected] wrote:

I find the search function very useful and I always use that. But server
side search usually returns many uninteresting results (I guess search
engines OR the words); for example if I search "The X", where X is a
particular word, I usually get also "The Y" "The Z" etc. So it would be
nice to have a filter field in every tab to remove (client side) the
unneeded items; in the example above, i would write X in the field and I
should see all the items not containing X disappear.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/36.

from qbittorrent.

teo83 avatar teo83 commented on May 21, 2024

That's an option but I was thinking about something simpler, like what is done in Eclipse's preference dialog, for example. A very very simple text box to filter out unneeded results, testing the filter string for containment in the torrent's title.

from qbittorrent.

dontdieych avatar dontdieych commented on May 21, 2024

I think this 'local filter for search result' feature should be implemented separately from generic search query feature.

Because all search engine responses differently with same search term.

  • some searches on only torrent file name.
  • some searches on also contents list.
  • some returns wrong results(e.g. misbehavior on CJK words).

So I think whatever we are doing on 'search query <-> search engines', there would be always unwanted results.

Moreover some search engine would not respond If I make search calls very fast. So It is safe waiting few or more seconds before narrowing down search results. And these search calls are quite expensive, i.e. long waiting time. It is awful if you don't get good results on first time.

So it would quite handy if we could get 'local filter for search results'.

Thanks.

from qbittorrent.

ngosang avatar ngosang commented on May 21, 2024

Already implemented #3989

from qbittorrent.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.