[Issue] I'd like to fix all of the Async naming conventions to ensure the suffix 'Async' is added wherever possible about revoke.net

[rainxh11]

Option 1 is better

[jeffward01]

Sounds good, i'll get started on Option 1 and make a pull request.

I will reach out if I have any questions.

Safer is always better 😄 thanks for the quick input 🚀

[jeffward01]

Hello!

I started to implement this here: https://github.com/jeffward01/Revoke.NET/tree/async-suffix

I noticed that the other projects rely on Revoke.Net version 2.0.1 from Nuget.

We could do something like:

Publish new version of Revoke.Net with the async methods to nuget: version 2.0.2 as an example,
Then after its 'live', I can work on upgrading the other projects.

---

What do you think?

If this is ok, I have made my PR, please publish the version to nuget, so I can start on converting the other projects.

You'll need to:

• Accept the PR
• Update the version number
• Create a new release
• Publish to nuget

Is this ok?

---

Question:

• Do you think they'll be any issues with the other projects? I think no, because the other projects will target 2.0.1, not 2.0.2.
  Thanks

[jeffward01]

I didn't realize I had Collaborator rights, thank you!! Very excited to help on this library. You are awesome.

I looked to see if I could perform the steps

• Accept the PR
• Update the version number
• Create a new release
• Publish to nuget

But it appears as if you don't have a GitHub Action / Trigger set up, so I am assuming you manually deploy the package to Nuget?

At a time in the near future I can implement a Github Action trigger, I will just need you to popular a repository variable (I wont have access to it) with your Nuget API token.

Here is a tutorial on how you can set up the API key. There are many other tutorials that you can review as well. Let me know if you need any help with this. Thanks