Modules which have no license field or non-standard values for "license" about ecosystem

[JJ]

Some of these distributions are now under the aegis of raku-community-modules. Maybe we should take a look at it.
And while we're at it, some still use META.info and/or panda. Also we should take a look at it...

[JJ]

With respect to the rest, we should take a decision with respect to them, including de-listing them from the ecosystem.

[jonathanstowe]

Probably need to revisit the above list, I'll knock something up a bit later to see what the current state is if someone doesn't get there first.

But personally I'd not be in favour of something quite so draconian as de-listing, I'd probably be more in favour of using a form of words like "We are unable to determine the licence for this module, the details may be available in some other form in the source code, if the licensing is of concern to you please contact the author" maybe with some additional disclaimer.

[JJ]

Well, not in the case of not having a license, of course. But the ecosystem is in need of a bit of curation... If we look hard enough, I'm sure we'll find quite a few META.info.