Missing License about blues-stack

[coder543]

I could certainly be missing something, and I would be happy if that were the case.

IANAL, but I would also point out that you can't simply add a license to this repo either. Relicensing code requires the consent of every contributor, which is why many organizations use CLAs, and there appear to be several dozen contributors, most of them being single line fixes or similar. Perhaps it is possible to delete those commits from the history (or just revert them) in order to reduce the number of people who would need to sign off on properly licensing this code, but IANAL.

As it is, all three of these "stacks" appear to be a legal quagmire, a hazard for anyone that uses them. Once again IANAL, but it doesn't seem to matter that these repos are "meant" to be templates, if there is no license for anyone to use them. If Remix has consulted with a lawyer and come to a different conclusion, it would be great to expand my understanding of how this stuff works.

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked stale because we haven't received a response from the original author in a while 🙈. This automation helps keep the issue tracker clean from issues that are not actionable. Please reach out if you have more information for us or you think this issue shouldn't be closed! 🙂 If you don't do so within 7 days, this issue will be automatically closed.

[coder543]

It hasn’t received a comment from the author (me) in awhile because no one else has responded… I have nothing further to add. That doesn’t mean this issue is any less relevant.

@kentcdodds @MichaelDeBoey