Roadmap to 2.3 about validation

[alganet]

Hi @andus4n, very few people tried the 2.3RC, so I'm giving it a little more time for us to find possible issues before launching it. The original idea was to release Match 15th, maybe we'll do it on April 15th!

[alganet]

@oschwald thanks for reporting this! I will look into it and get back to you soon.

[alganet]

If everything goes well, we'll release the RC tomorrow and close a lot of the issues marked as Next Release.

I moved some of the less non-implementation stuff to the final release date.

Hopefully, we'll have only one RC and not RC2 and etc. If you find anything unusual with the release candidate, you can use this issue to report it in a less formal way (or you can open a new issue, you can always do that 🐼 )

[alganet]

Release candidate 2.3.0-RC is out!

https://packagist.org/packages/respect/validation#2.3.0-RC

[andus4n]

hello. any news on the final 2.3 version?

[oschwald]

After seeing the above, I tested it out on maxmind/minfraud. Besides some minor exception text changes, I did notice an issue with 2014-04-12T23:20:50Z no longer being accepted as a valid RFC 3339 timestamp in this rule. This works fine on 2.2.4.

[andus4n]

hi. any news?