move ropensci image from rocker repo? about rocker

[eddelbuettel]

I'll let you make that call. It's kinda useful to have it in rocker-org as a use case.

But if you'd rather have it within rOpenSci, I can see the merit of that as well.

(Maybe hadleyverse want to be a repo in rocker-org as well? I can see a clear case for r-base, r-devel, rstudio being the core. The rest is really sugar coating.)

[cboettig]

yup, i like the idea of moving hadleyverse and r-devel-san to their own
repos in rocker-org, and ropensci as well. That reflects our original
discussion of 'base' vs use-case repos. I will go ahead and break out all
three if there are no objections?

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <
[email protected]> wrote:

I'll let you make that call. It's kinda useful to have it in rocker-org as
a use case.

But if you'd rather have it within rOpenSci, I can see the merit of that
as well.

(Maybe hadleyverse want to be a repo in rocker-org as well? I can see a
clear case for r-base, r-devel, rstudio being the core. The rest is really
sugar coating.)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#30 (comment).

Carl Boettiger
UC Santa Cruz
http://carlboettiger.info/

[eddelbuettel]

No that sounds very, very good. Also gets us closer to less costly commit to the main rocker repo...

[eddelbuettel]

Oh if you think "I should move out" with r-devel-san I can surely do so (on the weekend)...

[cboettig]

I think this is all done! I also added the automated build link to r-devel-san to update whenever r-base is updated.

[eddelbuettel]

Thanks for updating r-devel-san that way!