About page about roweb

[sckott]

Hmm, does this look better with a few changes to css (seems like headers are attached to the paragraphs before them, not after them)

And this is before the css changes

[karthik]

What did you change?

[karthik]

I'll fix the padding shortly.

[sckott]

.crew-3 h3 {
  font-family: "proxima-nova";
  margin: 0 0 20px; # was 80px
  font-size: 40px;
  font-weight: 600;
  font-variant: normal;
}

and added

.crew-3 p {
  margin: 0 0 20px;
}

[karthik]

Rather than a margin, I changed it to a padding.

[sckott]

ok

you working on the list css?

[karthik]

Yeah.

[sckott]

added reference link

[karthik]

I believe this is done. Onwards! ✨

[sckott]

nice

[karthik]

Fun aside, you can now deep link to any of the panels.

e.g.
Changing Science
Big Picture

[sckott]

cool, that is fun, maybe a # somewhere in each section so people know they can link?

[karthik]

hmm, not sure how to do that without breaking the aesthetic. I suppose we could tweet those sections first and see how that goes.

[sckott]

okay, just playin'

[sckott]

ixnay?

[karthik]

Yeah, that really breaks the aesthetic, and will be even more cluttered on the small screen. I think it should be fine for people just to explore the whole page on their own.

[cboettig]

If you want people to be able to click and get the deep link, why not just
put a link anchor around the relevant text or image? The css could still be
codes such that the anchor doesn't affect the aesthetic, but a user would
notice by mouse over or tapping on the text.

(Not saying that we need anchor element at all -- pandoc puts these in as
id tags on header elements by default without making each header into a
link, which I rather like.)

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Karthik Ram [email protected]:

Yeah, that really breaks the aesthetic, and will be even more cluttered on
the small screen. I think it should be fine for people just to explore the
whole page on their own.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/12#issuecomment-41104942
.

Carl Boettiger
UC Santa Cruz
http://carlboettiger.info/

[karthik]

Right. I’ll see if I can write some css to do that. Only show on hover for the title.

On April 22, 2014 at 3:48:51 PM, Boettiger Carl ([email protected]) wrote:

If you want people to be able to click and get the deep link, why not just
put a link anchor around the relevant text or image? The css could still be
codes such that the anchor doesn't affect the aesthetic, but a user would
notice by mouse over or tapping on the text.

(Not saying that we need anchor element at all -- pandoc puts these in as
id tags on header elements by default without making each header into a
link, which I rather like.)

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Karthik Ram wrote:

Yeah, that really breaks the aesthetic, and will be even more cluttered on
the small screen. I think it should be fine for people just to explore the
whole page on their own.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
.

Carl Boettiger
UC Santa Cruz
http://carlboettiger.info/

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#12 (comment)