Comments (4)
Please don't cross past with stack exchange. If/when folks are able to help with your question there, they will 😄
Some tips to get more / better responses on stack exchange:
- Keep it to one problem at a time
- Describe your problem in detail and be clear, other people aren't likely to be running into the exact flavor of problem you're running into at a particular time to read between the lines
- Do some debugging first and let folks know what you've already found out
from navigation2.
Thanks for the suggestion. @SteveMacenski
However, that's what I have done from past issues and it didn't got solved even after giving details from my end.
That is why I ended up opening the issue here after waiting and debugging it myself.
The issue in stack exchange highlights only one problem which was already asked previously but not able to solve that from my end.
The other part just ask a question which I added in this issue as well
from navigation2.
Not every problem is something that is going to receive 'here's the precise answer' answers. We're an open-source community and only have so much time to answer user questions -- and this particular query sounds more in depth of user configurations and application details than the maintainers can ask / respond to 20 Q&As to get to the bottom of what you're trying to do and where its going wrong, which sounds like multiple places. What you're trying to do is definitely possible, but it will require you to read the documentation and understand the techniques you're trying to apply.
I'm definitely not trying to funnel open-source questions into Open Navigation's consulting business in general, but the detail and level of engagement to fully understand and resolve your issue sounds like it might fall into that category if you're unable to find root cause and resolve it yourself (which I think you should be able to). If that's something you'd be interested in, email [email protected]. Unfortunately I can't dedicate 10 hours of my time to trying to resolve every user's individual configuration quirks (else I'd never get anything done)
from navigation2.
I understand your suggestions and thanks for your time.
I am just trying to setup simple NAV2 stack for Ackermann-steered robot for which I know this is something related to configuration issues. I have gone through the documentation and trying to dig it deeper but some what coming to this end it seems to be bit confusing which parameter to change in global and local costmap params.
I have turned on clearing = true
under costmap params, the issue seems to me that it is considering the starting cell as occupied.
from navigation2.
Related Issues (20)
- MPPI cannot follow global path accurately HOT 1
- [Collision_monitor] Approach polygon time=0 step is not processed HOT 7
- The lidar point cloud of NAV2 shifted significantly after being stationary for 5 minutes. HOT 5
- Errors with controller_server using GPS for Navigation HOT 4
- Obstacle Position Shift in Map after Loading HOT 2
- Full footprint collsion distance in MPPI obstacle critic and use of collision_margin_distance. HOT 13
- local_costmap does not respect the use_sim_time parameter HOT 12
- Vector polygon - Collision Monitor is not available for ROS2 humble HOT 5
- [collision_monitor] Add temporal axis to min_points behavior HOT 2
- [ERROR] [1716697697.080277840] [rviz2]: Lookup would require extrapolation into the future. Requested time 1716697697.040514 but the latest data is at time 1716697697.039929, when looking up transform from frame [laser_frame] to frame [odom]
- Laser Scan rotates with robot ------- [ERROR] [1716697697.080277840] [rviz2]: Lookup would require extrapolation into the future. Requested time 1716697697.040514 but the latest data is at time 1716697697.039929, when looking up transform from frame [laser_frame] to frame [odom] HOT 1
- [for help] action `follow_path` doesn't work (humble) HOT 7
- Changing the params file HOT 1
- Understand MPPI Critics and parameters HOT 2
- 18 bugs (UAF) in `nav2_amcl` by setting dynamic parameters HOT 6
- MPPI ARM Binaries Issue HOT 9
- velocity smoother deadband velocity as an interval HOT 10
- Remove old Gazebo stuff once new gazebo lands HOT 9
- revisit nav2_behavior_tree workarounds HOT 3
- test_decorator_speed_controller complains about not finding template specialization (but succeeds) HOT 3
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from navigation2.