Renew Ecosystem about tinygo-keyboard

[sago35]

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Indeed, I agree that having an increasing number of targets can become an issue. Additionally, KiCad data might not be essential. I believe there is a need to split the repository in some way.
Personally, I think it would be beneficial to reduce it to only a few representative keyboard implementations, also for the sake of testing.

[Diwamoto]

KiCad data might not be essential

Yeah, I agree.
We believe that this repository belongs to you and that you should be the final arbiter of where this repository goes.

We are still working on the architecture of the PR I mentioned the other day, but when the PR is ready, we can discuss whether it should be merged into this repository, or whether it should be a separate repository with a new commit log stacked on top of it.

[Diwamoto]

I would like to decide on some kind of project name.
tinygo covers the parent and namespace, and keyboard covers machine/usb/hid/keyboard.
How about TGK(TinyGo Keyboard)_firmware for example, like other firmware projects for keyboards such as qmk and zmk.
It would be interesting to give it a more unique name. (I can't think of one, lol)