Language inconsistency in traffic metrics about smi-spec

[grampelberg]

Hmmm, how about:

Finally, resource can be as general or specific as desired. For example, with a direction of to and an empty resource, the metrics are for all the traffic received by the foo-775b9cbd88-ntxsl pod.

[SirNexus]

I like the "to" phrasing, because it emphasizes the intent of using the to keyword in the edge. But I understand that "other resources" is a big vague.

However, if we change the wording to "received", perhaps don't italicize? I think the reason to is italicized is to emphasize that the keyword to in the example represents traffic to a particular resource.

[grampelberg]

Yeah, I was finding that reusing to the confusing bit for me. The gist is that if edge doesn't actually point to anything, it is always the traffic being received by resource.

[SirNexus]

I am alright with your suggestion. Would you like me to open a PR? Do you still think the italics are warranted?

[grampelberg]

A PR would be awesome! I think you're right, the italics aren't required.