Improve PAM resource matching ability about inspec-profile-disa_stig-el7

[trevor-vaughan]

@samcornwell Could you provide an example of this where the arguments are known? One of the reasons that I didn't go down this route was that you would need to know exactly what you are looking at. Or are you suggesting that, should we have a number, we try numeric matches and fall back to a regex if that raises an exception?

[samcornwell]

I'm just saying that something like with_args(/remember=(\d{2,}|[5-9])/) would be better if we could select the arg remember and apply the real construct >= 5 to its value somehow.

My ruby and RSpec foo are not good enough to know exactly how to do it most easily. I thought it would be ideal to be able to be able to select the arg inline (like is done with with_args) and apply one of the the native matchers to it, but I don't know if it's possible to do that easily. Perhaps one would have to define their own ops and pass those in, or chain them.

Maybe the best way would be to select the rules using a where, and iterate over those using a PamRule resource or structure. A new resource is more work than I intended to propose though.

[samcornwell]

fixed by #41