Comments (3)
Interesting, I didn't consider that. I'll research the matter. Maybe I'll close this until I have the time, it may still be useful to someone running a search.
from simplecov.
@fdr I don't think this has been brought up before, and granted that ractors aren't yet very common in use in ruby as far as I know I think it's possible it wasn't yet tried out. It would be nice to know whether this is related to simplecov or the ruby stdlib coverage module itself in the first place, because in the latter case this issue should be reported in the ruby issue tracker first.
If you try to make an isolated example, could you please first try to do it with the coverage module first?
from simplecov.
I just spent quite a bit of time finding this out, so maybe this issue should stay open :)
It seems to be a problem with Ruby's own Coverage module, so I've opened an issue in the Ruby bug tracker.
from simplecov.
Related Issues (20)
- branch coverage data missing after collating .resultset.json in parallel test HOT 2
- allow skipping (unreachable) branch coverage only HOT 10
- option to disable line warnings with `enable_coverage_for_eval` and rails views HOT 3
- Branch coverage for the files which don't have _spec files
- "Coverage report generated" is being written to the stdout stream
- Default configurations around coverage criteria and minimum coverage
- Minor documentation fix
- [Feature Request] Don't require all branches to be covered twice in ensure-blocks HOT 3
- Support for other Parallel Testing gems
- SimpleCov does not fail for low coverage for parallel_tests when using 1 process
- SimpleCov only reports the last controller test and sets to 0.0% all previous results HOT 1
- False positives for `begin` lines, a constant definition, and some heredoc content
- مشکل <3
- Rails 7.1 update => test coverage drop HOT 6
- Coverage changes after each run HOT 1
- 0.22.0 release is missing on GitHub
- Coverage dropped in Rails 7.1 (fixed) HOT 1
- Bad usability on bigger projects (>1000s files)
- README says SimpleCov.start should be called after SimpleCov.at_fork, is it true? HOT 1
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from simplecov.