What does "IRI ``" mean? about spdx-3-model

[zvr]

Thanks for reporting this, @vargenau .

In this repo, there is no such information; as you can see in https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/blob/main/model/Core/Individuals/NoAssertionElement.md there is no IRI.

I think you are reporting that the empty IRI appears in the generated specification.

This seems to be an issue with the generator; I'll fix it shortly.

When you say "(and several others)" do you mean more than the one you listed and NoneElement?

[vargenau]

Hi @zvr

I see it here:

• https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v3.0/model/Core/Individuals/NoAssertionElement/

And also:

• https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v3.0/model/Core/Individuals/NoneElement/

It is present with a value in:

• https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v3.0/model/ExpandedLicensing/Individuals/NoAssertionLicense/
• https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v3.0/model/ExpandedLicensing/Individuals/NoneLicense/

[zvr]

Thanks, @vargenau .

I knew of the two instances -- I was intrigued by your "and several others".

Fixed in spec-parser.

[vargenau]

Yes, there were only two. Sorry for the confusion.

[zvr]

No problem. Shall we close this issue?

[vargenau]

Yes, if it is fixed in the parser, you can close the issue.