Implement a factory for creating the ExecutorService inside RequestProcessor about robospice

[stephanenicolas]

Hello,

thank you for submitting this issue (and trying robospice) and using RoboSpice. We are actually actively hacking RoboSpice. There are gonna be substantial changes in the persistence layer. We will take you feature request into account.

What do you think if we had a second constructor to RequestProcessor in order to provide the instance with a given ExecutorService ?

Then we could add a factory method inside the ContentService class (that's gonna be renamed to SpiceService) in order to create the RequestProcessor. Creating a custom service would allow to override this factory method and supply the request processor a custom ExectuorService ?

Sorry for the delay, I must redirect my emails from git hub to my professional account to be more reactive.

[rciovati]

Actually it was exactly the solution i was thinking about but unfortunately i had no time for submitting a pull request.

Please don't change too much the library's apis, i already started using it in my project :D

[stephanenicolas]

That's fine though. We will include this feature in 1.1, it's planned to be released for Droid Con.

Thx for your interest.

And what did you think of the lib as a whole ? V1.0 gives a pretty good idea of RoboSpice, but we think V1.1 will really rock :)

[rciovati]

As far as i used it i think it's a great library! I'll provide more feedbacks during the next weeks. Meanwhile, thanks very much! :)

A couple thing i'm thinking about:

• it would be useful a way to disable logcat logging.
• it would be useful to create a Google Group where discuss about library usage.

[stephanenicolas]

Thanks for this feedback Riccardo.

We have begun a talk on a logging solution. We want to keep spice simple
and lightweight, but if you know of a good logging framework, let us know.
Personnaly, I really like the one inside roboguice, but it comes with all
Roboguice and not as a separate module and it's too heavy as a dependency.

We will open a discussion group on google.

Thanks,
S.

2012/10/19 Riccardo Ciovati [email protected]

As far as i used it i think it's a great library! I'll provide more
feedbacks during the next weeks. Meanwhile, thanks very much! :)

A couple thing i'm thinking about:

• it would be useful a way to disable logcat logging.

• it would be useful to create a Google Group where discuss about
  library usage.

  —
  Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/2#issuecomment-9599591.

Stéphane NICOLAS,
OCTO Technology
Développeur & Consultant Android / Java
..........................................................
50, Avenue des Champs-Elysées
75008 Paris
+33 (0)6.26.32.34.09
www.octo.com - blog.octo.com
www.usievents.com
...........................................................

[stephanenicolas]

Hi Ricardo,

the RoboSpice discussion group is now up and running :

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/robospice

You are more than welcome :)

Stéphane

[rciovati]

Thanks Stéphane, i'll post soon :-)
And... you was right, v1.1's features rock!

Best regards,
Riccardo

2012/10/22 stephanenicolas [email protected]

Hi Ricardo,

the RoboSpice discussion group is now up and running :

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/robospice

You are more than welcome :)

Stéphane

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/2#issuecomment-9652378.

Riccardo Ciovati

[stephanenicolas]

This feature is part of the V1.1 release.