Tape library support about robospice

[chrisjenx]

I was thinking about this when I get around to it, Its only really useful for posting data making sure it isnt lost. For standard requests I would use the GoogleClient combined with retry policy.

[stephanenicolas]

I had though about this as I am a big fan/user of Square libs too. Who
isn't ? ;)

Tape could be interesting, mostly in the use case Christopher emphasized.
Nevertheless, I don't know much of it and it would be interesting to see in
which way it could be mixed with RoboSpice, maybe in an extension module. I
only fear it's gonna enforce some constraints on requests (such as beeing
serializable), and that would be far too strong as RS gives more freedom in
building requests.

S.

2013/2/28 Christopher Jenkins [email protected]

I was thinking about this when I get around to it, Its only really useful
for posting data making sure it isnt lost. For standard requests I would
use the GoogleClient combined with retry policy.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/52#issuecomment-14251034
.

Stéphane NICOLAS,
OCTO Technology
Développeur & Consultant Android / Java
..........................................................
50, Avenue des Champs-Elysées
75008 Paris
+33 (0)6.26.32.34.09
www.octo.com - blog.octo.com
www.usievents.com
...........................................................

[stephanenicolas]

If any one is interested to contribute to such a module, that would be a good contribution. Otherwise I would postpone it.

[pommedeterresautee]

Hi Nocholas,

I am still playing with the library, I need to have some experience with it before doing that. You may close this thread if you want, this task is already in my TODO list, just not yet at the top.

Regards

[stephanenicolas]

Fine for me. Feel free to knock again when you are ready to work on that. I
tend to prefer talking with people before they submit a pull request so
that we can agree on a new feature, the way to implement and test it.

Regards,
Stéphane

2013/3/4 El Potaeto [email protected]

Hi Nocholas,

I am still playing with the library, I need to have some experience with
it before doing that. You may close this thread if you want, this task is
already in my TODO list, just not yet at the top.

Regards

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/52#issuecomment-14371431
.

Stéphane NICOLAS,
OCTO Technology
Développeur & Consultant Android / Java
..........................................................
50, Avenue des Champs-Elysées
75008 Paris
+33 (0)6.26.32.34.09
www.octo.com - blog.octo.com
www.usievents.com
...........................................................

[zetxek]

Has there been any advance on Tape implementation? It's a really interesting feature indeed.

[stephanenicolas]

Not at all. Would you like to submit a PR & become an enthousiastic RS contributor ?

[chrisjenx]

I guess I better way of looking at this would be the Path lib which is
background extensible queue. That would be a better fit.
On 16 Jun 2014 18:55, "Adrián Moreno Peña" [email protected] wrote:

Has there been any advance on Tape implementation? It's a really
interesting feature indeed.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#52 (comment)
.

[stephanenicolas]

Any link @chrisjenx ?

[zetxek]

I think it can be this one?

https://github.com/path/android-priority-jobqueue

I am taking a look to the possibilities, but I would like getting a general enough solution so that it can be packed as a module and get into Robospice. We need to implement a "infinite retry" policy, and I think it would be better implemented with a request persister module like Tape (or maybe path's lib that @chrisjenx mentioned, I didn't know about it)

[chrisjenx]

See https://github.com/path/android-priority-jobqueue
On 16 Jun 2014 18:58, "Stéphane Nicolas" [email protected] wrote:

Any link @chrisjenx https://github.com/chrisjenx ?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#52 (comment)
.